Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 01:20
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
A common herb shows promise for boosting brain health and fighting Alzheimer’s - PsyPost
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What led Megan to marry into the Royal Family despite her successful acting career in Hollywood?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
What's the biggest myth about illegal immigrants?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Scientists Found Cancer in a Dinosaur – And It Might Help Save Human Lives - ScienceAlert
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Would you let your partner cheat on you every now and again?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Post-Dobbs abortions continue to increase: Report - Axios
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
AMD CEO Su turns heads with comments at AI event - TheStreet